Legal Opinion

Brady v. Bureau of Labor and Industries

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 25, 1982No. 2-79, CA A20220PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Petitioner, a dentist, seeks review of an order of the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor (Commissioner) finding that he was guilty of an unlawful employment practice in that he had refused on the basis of sex to hire a qualified job applicant for a position as dental assistant. ORS 659.030(l)(a). He contends that there was no substantial evidence in the record to support the Commissioner’s order. We reverse and remand.

This case began March 14, 1979, when the Commissioner filed charges of sex discrimination in hiring against petitioner. The charges alleged that he had refused to hire…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lewis & Clark College v. Bureau of LaborCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. Spray v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Spray v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1, ETC. v. Mission Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. Van Gordon v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Korgan v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. Brady v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. Britton v. Board of Podiatry ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API