Legal Opinion

Rose v. Rose

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1883PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Washtenaw. (Joslin, J.) Divorce bill. Defendant

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, C. J.

The bill in this cause was filed for a severance of the bonds of marriage on a charge of desertion for the period of two years, and the court granted a decree. To make out a case for the dissolution of marriage on this ground there must be satisfactory proof of three things: First, cessation of cohabitation; second, an intent in the mind of the defendant to desert; and third, that the separation was against the will of complainant. Cooper v. Cooper 17 Mich. 205; Porritt v. Porritt 18 Mich. 120; Rudd v. Rudd 33 Mich. 101; Cox v. Cox 35 Mich. 161; Sergent v. Sergent 33 N. J. Eq. 201.

Assuming…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cooper v. CooperMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Goodrich v. LelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Rudd v. RuddMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. StickleMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Kupka v. KupkaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  4. Root v. RootMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Beckmann v. BeckmannMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API