Rose v. Rose
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Washtenaw. (Joslin, J.) Divorce bill. Defendant
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, C. J.
The bill in this cause was filed for a severance of the bonds of marriage on a charge of desertion for the period of two years, and the court granted a decree. To make out a case for the dissolution of marriage on this ground there must be satisfactory proof of three things: First, cessation of cohabitation; second, an intent in the mind of the defendant to desert; and third, that the separation was against the will of complainant. Cooper v. Cooper 17 Mich. 205; Porritt v. Porritt 18 Mich. 120; Rudd v. Rudd 33 Mich. 101; Cox v. Cox 35 Mich. 161; Sergent v. Sergent 33 N. J. Eq. 201.
Assuming…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cooper v. CooperMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Goodrich v. LelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Rudd v. RuddMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. StickleMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Kupka v. KupkaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
- Root v. RootMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Beckmann v. BeckmannMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.