Legal Opinion
United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 18, 1983No. 60 W.D. Appeal Dkt. 1982PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HUTCHINSON, Justice:
This case presents a single question: does Pennsylvania háve the minimal contacts due process requires to exercise personal jurisdiction over a non-resident liability carrier in a suit brought by a Pennsylvania no-fault assigned risk carrier? In this suit for a declaratory judgment the local no-fault carrier asserts the non-resident liability carrier is responsible for Pennsylvania no-fault benefits arguably due the foreign carrier’s insureds.1
The insureds’ claim to Pennsylvania no-fault benefits resulted from an auto accident in Pennsylvania. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. The Portage La Prairie Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Kubik v. LetteriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Simmers v. American Cyanamid Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Skinner v. Flymo, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Bahn v. Chicago Motor Club InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.