Legal Opinion
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Boohaker
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 20, 2014No. 2014 CA 0594PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrain, J.
lain this suit seeking to enforce a promissory note secured by a mortgage, the trial court entered an order that prohibits the plaintiff from using certain evidence as a sanction for noncompliance with court-ordered discovery. Thereafter, the trial court granted peremptory exceptions of no right of action and prescription and dismissed the case. We affirm the order imposing the discovery sanction, reverse the judgment granting the peremptory exceptions, and remand.
*424FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. filed a petition on June 1, 2011, against Boolus Boohaker and Bonnie Bivens…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- O.K. Realty Co. v. John A. Juliani, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
- Leake v. ParsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Root Glass Co. v. GaglianoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Nee v. N. O. Public Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Horton v. McCarySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Stevens v. St. Tammany Parish GovernmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- In re DeanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- St. Cyr v. St. CyrLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Three Rivers Commons Condominium Ass'n v. GrodnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Collins Asset Group, LLC v. Eddie J. HamiltonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.