Cohn & Rosenberger, Inc. v. Kaufman & Ruderman, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.
In this action for trade-mark infringement and unfair competition between two companies in the costume jewelry business, it is substantially conceded that the defendant’s mark “ Karu ” constitutes an infringement of plaintiff’s mark “ Coro.” The complaint was dismissed below on the basis of a finding that plaintiff’s long acquiescence in defendant’s use of the infringing mark created an estoppél which bars all relief. We agree that plaintiff’s conduct constitutes laches and precludes any right to damages. That is no reason, however, why the defendant should be permitted to practice a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Columbia Records, Inc. v. GoodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Holt v. MenendezU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
3Cited by10 opinions
- Saratoga Vichy Spring Co., Inc. v. Orin Lehman, Commissioner of Parks and Recreation of the the State of New York and Waters of Saratoga Springs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Toys "R" US, Inc. v. Canarsie Kiddie Shop, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1983
- Dial-A-Mattress Operating Corp. v. Mattress Madness, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Gillette Company v. Ed Pinaud, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Field Enterprises Educational Corp. v. Cove Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.