Legal Opinion

Smith & Conklin Bros. v. Griffith

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1954No. A-4387PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hickman

In the trial court respondent Howard Vernon Griffith was awarded damages for personal injuries against petitioner Smith & Conklin Brothers, and the trial court’s judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 260 S.W. 2d 705.

Respondent was an employee of Starworth Drilling Company, and received his injuries as a result of an accident which happened while an oil well drilling rig owned by his employer was being dismantled. Petitioners operate a truck line, and had been employed by Starworth Drilling Company to move the drilling rig from one location to another. They had two employees on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith & Conklin Bros. v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Booker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  2. George C. Vaughan & Sons v. DyessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Schwab v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Thompson v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Robinson v. AshnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API