Legal Opinion

Gersyl Corp. v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCharles J. Beckinella, J.

This is a motion made pursuant to subdivision 6 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law to amend a notice of claim filed by the plaintiffs with the defendant on November 28, 1947.

The plaintiffs are the owner of a building and a druggist who occupied a store in the building. In the notice of claim filed on November 28, 1947, the plaintiffs alleged that they had sustained damages by reason of the fact that the City of New York had negligently operated its transportation system near the building so as to cause excess vibration; had negligently inspected the building so as to cause it to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Teresta v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Ostrow v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Village of Port LeydenNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Oliveras v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Powell v. Town of GatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  4. Stanton Foundry, Inc. v. Onondaga County Water AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API