Legal Opinion

Oliveras v. New York City Transit Authority

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1960Published

1Opinion of the CourtJacob J. Schwartzwald, J.

An application has been made on behalf of an infant over the age of 14 years, to wit, 20 years of age, and his guardian ad litem for leave ‘1 to serve an amended Notice of Claim ” upon the New York City Transit Authority.

The relief is apparently being sought pursuant to the provisions of the General Municipal Law (§ 50-e, subd. 6) since the appeal for relief directs itself to the court’s discretion and includes as a ground for the application the allegation that the other party will not he prejudiced thereby.

*712According to the first notice of claim, timely served, the infant was injured on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Teresta v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Nori v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. Nori v. City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Gersyl Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API