Legal Opinion

Gaupholm v. Aurora Office Buildings, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 6, 1970No. 97-40449-1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants Jack L. Duranceau and Adolf D. Koch were found by the trial court to be personally liable on a promissory note of Marfran Office Buildings, Inc. They appeal, directing error to several of the findings of fact. Since a statement of facts has not been filed, we are powerless to conduct a review of these findings. Clark v. Fowler, 58 Wn.2d 435, 363 P.2d 812 (1961).

The recital prehminary to the findings of fact states that “plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment should be granted . . .” . Assuming that this brings the appeal from a summary judgment, we still are unable to consider it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Universal Insurance v. RansonWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Kataisto v. LowWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Clark v. FowlerWashington Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Green v. Normandy ParkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. Green v. Normandy Park Riviera Section Community Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. Sime Construction Co. v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  4. Rekhi v. OlasonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  5. Franklin v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API