Legal Opinion

Clark v. Fowler

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1961No. 35742PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.

The contractor commenced this action to recover the alleged balance due him for the construction of the owners’ residence. The owners answered, claiming an offset for improper installation of the furnace, and other minor items.

From a judgment in favor of the owners, the contractor has appealed.

The appellant states that “this appeal is based upon the premise that the Conclusions of Law and Judgment are not supported by the Court’s Findings of Fact.” The findings of fact are as follows:

“(1) At all times herein mentioned and referred to, defendants were and now are husband and wife, and as such…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bellingham Securities Syndicate, Inc. v. Bellingham Coal Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Trompeter v. United InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Wilder v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Armstrong Construction Co. v. ThomsonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Guay v. Washington Natural Gas Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. S. S. Kresge Co. v. Port of LongviewCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  4. Hall v. American Friends Service Committee, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Gaupholm v. Aurora Office Buildings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API