Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Thornton

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 14, 1925No. A-5460PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

The petitioner, A H. Thornton, alleges that he is illegally restrained by the mayor and chief of police of the city of Chickasha, and that the said restraint is by virtue of a void ordinance and a void proceeding therein by which he was adjudged to pay a fine intthe said court of said city.

The respondents have made return, admitting that they are the mayor and chief of police of said city, and that on the 23d day of February the petitioner was adjudged guilty of vagrancy and a fine of $19 assessed against him and he was ordered committed until such fine was paid, and further claim that said…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re TalleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Ex Parte JustusCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Ex Parte HunnicuttCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Ex Parte JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Lumpkin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PackCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Ex Parte JacksonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Application of HoodCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API