Legal Opinion

Hamburg Bank v. Zimmerman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 10, 1938No. 4-5187PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

B. and E. Zimmerman instituted a suit in the chancery court of Ashley county against James A. Murphy and wife, Hamburg Bank, Robert Wallace et al., for a judgment against the Murphys upon a promissory note for $800, dated April 15, 1919, and to foreclose a mortgage executed by the Murphys on the same date to the Conservative Loan Company, as security for the payment of the aforesaid note.

The mortgage covered an eighty-acre tract of land in Ashley county, and was by the Conservative Loan Company duly assigned to the Sheboygan Loan Security Company, and on December 28, 1922, the Sheboygan Loan…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morgan v. KendrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. Clark v. LesserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  3. Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. GarrottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  4. Beith v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  5. Wells v. Farmers' Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Polster v. LangleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  2. Henry v. CoeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  3. Jimerson v. ReedSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  4. Bank of New York v. University Partners, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1989
  5. Buss v. CooleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API