Legal Opinion

Beith v. McKenzie

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 30, 1935No. 4-3947PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

Section 7408 of Crawford & Moses’ Digest provides: “In suits to foreclose or enforce mortgages or deeds of trust, it shall be sufficient defense that they have not been brought within the period of limitation prescribed by law for a suit on the debt or liability for the security of which they were given. Provided, when any payment is made on any such existing indebtedness before the same is barred by the statute of limitation, such payment shall not operate to revive said debts or to extend the operations of the statute of limitation, with reference thereto, so far as the same affects the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morgan v. KendrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. Leonhard v. FloodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
  3. Bagley v. FletcherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
  4. McKinley v. BlackSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Coco v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  2. Polster v. LangleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  3. Hamburg Bank v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  4. Lucado v. A. Hirsch Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  5. United States v. 48.9 Acres of Land in Pike CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API