Legal Opinion
Steenrod v. City of Oneonta
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 7, 2010PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
*1031Petitioner is the owner of a three-apartment, 10-bedroom house in the City of Oneonta, Otsego County that he rents to college students on an annual basis. When he applied for a special use permit to allow him to also rent the property to summer transients on a weekly basis, respondent City of Oneonta Common Council (hereinafter respondent) denied his application. Petitioner then commenced this proceeding to annul respondent’s determination, and Supreme Court properly dismissed his petition.
When a municipality’s determination of an application for a special use permit has a rational basis and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- MATTER OF MKT. SQUARE PROPS., LTD. v. Town of Guilderland Zoning Bd. of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Ohrenstein v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Metro Enviro Transfer, LLC v. Village of Croton-on-HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Market Square Properties, Ltd. v. Town of Guilderland Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Metro Enviro Transfer v. Village of Croton-on-HudsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cornelius v. City of OneontaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Kinderhook Development, LLC v. City of Gloversville Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Matter of Frigault v. Town of Richfield Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of Moe's Motor Cars, LLC v. Town of UlsterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024