Legal Opinion
Metro Enviro Transfer, LLC v. Village of Croton-on-Hudson
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 6, 2005PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rosenblatt, J.
The question in this appeal is whether a village board’s decision not to renew a special use permit was supported by substantial evidence. We hold that it was.
In 1998, Croton-on-Hudson’s Village Board of Trustees approved a three-year special use permit for a solid waste transfer facility operated by Metro Enviro, LLC.1 The permit contained 42 special conditions, including capacity limitations. Other conditions included delineating types of waste that were not allowed in the facility and specifying training required of facility personnel.
Over the three-year…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Retail Property Trust v. Board of Zoning AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- MATTER OF TWIN COUNTY RECYCLING CORP. v. YevoliNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- MATTER OF MKT. SQUARE PROPS., LTD. v. Town of Guilderland Zoning Bd. of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Atlantic Cement Co. v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Metro Enviro Transfer v. Village of Croton-on-HudsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by16 opinions
- Valentine v. McLaughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Witkowich v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Moy v. Board of Town TrusteesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Village of Croton-on-Hudson v. Northeast Interchange Railway, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Matter of Frigault v. Town of Richfield Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.