Legal Opinion

County of Montmorency v. Putnam

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Montmorency; Kelley, J. Assumpsit by the county of Montmorency against Edward J. Putnam, principal, and Lewis Jenson and others, sureties, on a county treasurer’s bond. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.

This is an action on the official bond of the former treasurer of Montmorency county. The evidence on the trial consisted of testimony of expert accountants, the books of the treasurer and vouchers produced, and also three settlements made by and between the treasurer and the board of supervisors. At the con*582elusion of the testimony, the circuit judge announced that, in view of the claims of the respective parties, the settlements cut no figure in the case, as determining the amount due, and restricted counsel in the argument of the case when they were trying to make use of the settlements as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bush v. Johnson CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Township of Boardman v. FlaggMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. County of Montmorency v. PutnamMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. County of Montmorency v. PutnamMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Board of Supervisors v. DickerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. County of Montmorency v. PutnamMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API