Legal Opinion

Holt v. Peacock

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

EXCEPTIONS PROM CIRCUIT COURT, FlRST OlRCuiT.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

WILDER, J.

This is an action instituted in the district court of Honolulu for the collection from defendant of personal and property taxes for the years 1904 and 1905, the complaint containing two counts, the first count being “for taxes assessed against the person and property of the defendant” for the years in question, and the second one for “personal faxes” for the same years. Defendant demurred to the complaint on the ground that each count combined separate causes of action without being separately stated. The demurrer was overruled, trial had and judgment entered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hawaii Mill Co. v. AndradeHawaii Supreme Court · 1902
  2. McKeague v. HelenHawaii Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Holt v. Wong KwaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coombs & Powell v. RogersHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Wong Young v. Kum ChongHawaii Supreme Court · 1917
  3. MacIel v. TellesHawaii Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API