Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Montana v. Crow Tribe of Indians

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 18, 1998No. 96-1829Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Souter

The Court’s meticulous treatment of this exhausting litigation, including its discussion of the way Cotton Petroleum Corp. v. New Mexico, 490 U. S. 163, 186, n. 17 (1989), bears on Crow Tribe v. Montana, 819 F. 2d 895 (CA9 1987) (Grow II), summarily aff’d, 484 U. S. 997 (1988), shows the error of *720requiring disgorgement to the Crow Tribe of all Montana taxes collected from Westmoreland based on coal mined from the ceded strip between 1976 and 1982. As the Court explains, ante, at 715, Cotton Petroleum makes clear that the taxes were objectionable not because the State was wholly disentitled to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cotton Petroleum Corp. v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Crow Tribe of Indians v. State of Montana, and Ramon Dore, Director, Montana Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Town of Balkan v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Valley County v. ThomasMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  5. School District No. 6 v. School District No. 5Michigan Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API