State v. Bliss
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Charlotte June Bliss appeals her jury trial conviction for unlawful possession of methamphetamine. She argues that the trial court erred (1) in denying her CrR 3.6 motion to suppress the methamphetamine; and (2) in concluding that the arresting officer acted reasonably in *200stopping Bliss’s vehicle to verify that she was the registered owner, for whom there were outstanding arrest warrants. Because the record is insufficiently developed for us to determine whether suppression is warranted under Arizona v. Gant,_U.S._, 129 S. Ct. 1710, 173 L. Ed. 2d 485 (2009), we remand to the trial court…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. Z.U.E.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. Z.U.E.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. TempleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State Of Washington v. Darian LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.