Legal Opinion

State v. Bliss

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 17, 2009No. 37393-9-IIPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Charlotte June Bliss appeals her jury trial conviction for unlawful possession of methamphetamine. She argues that the trial court erred (1) in denying her CrR 3.6 motion to suppress the methamphetamine; and (2) in concluding that the arresting officer acted reasonably in *200stopping Bliss’s vehicle to verify that she was the registered owner, for whom there were outstanding arrest warrants. Because the record is insufficiently developed for us to determine whether suppression is warranted under Arizona v. Gant,_U.S._, 129 S. Ct. 1710, 173 L. Ed. 2d 485 (2009), we remand to the trial court…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. Z.U.E.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. Z.U.E.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. State v. TempleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. State Of Washington v. Darian LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API