Legal Opinion

In Re Rubinski

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 13, 2006No. 19-40006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

WILLIAM C. HILLMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. Introduction

The matter before me is the objection by Edward G. Rubinski (“Debtor”) to claim number 4 (“Claim 4”) of the Massachusetts Department of Revenue Child Support Enforcement Division (“MDOR/CSE”). 1 The Objection essentially challenges the amount of Claim 4, with a twist: the Debtor also alleges that confirmation of the Debtor’s Chapter 13 plan is res judicata as to the dischargeability of the claims of the MDOR/CSE. For the reasons stated below, I will enter an order overruling the Objection.

II. Background

The facts are…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cen-Pen Corporation v. Walter E. Hanson Loraine P. HansonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  2. Andersen v. UNIPAC-NEBHELP (In Re Andersen)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. In Re: Craig D. Hanson, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Gonzalez-Pina v. Guillermo-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  5. DePaolo v. United States (In re DePaolo)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re WhiteUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API