In Re Rubinski
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
WILLIAM C. HILLMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. Introduction
The matter before me is the objection by Edward G. Rubinski (“Debtor”) to claim number 4 (“Claim 4”) of the Massachusetts Department of Revenue Child Support Enforcement Division (“MDOR/CSE”). 1 The Objection essentially challenges the amount of Claim 4, with a twist: the Debtor also alleges that confirmation of the Debtor’s Chapter 13 plan is res judicata as to the dischargeability of the claims of the MDOR/CSE. For the reasons stated below, I will enter an order overruling the Objection.
II. Background
The facts are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cen-Pen Corporation v. Walter E. Hanson Loraine P. HansonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Andersen v. UNIPAC-NEBHELP (In Re Andersen)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- In Re: Craig D. Hanson, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Gonzalez-Pina v. Guillermo-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- DePaolo v. United States (In re DePaolo)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re WhiteUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007