Legal Opinion

Russell-Stewart, Inc. v. Birkett

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1960PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Edgar J. Nathan, Jr., J.

Plaintiff operates an agency in the New York City metropolitian area, whose main function is to seek employment for fashion models listed with it. The defendant is a fashion model who first became listed with the plaintiff in 1954. About three years later, in September, 1957, plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract by the terms of which plaintiff was employed as defendant’s exclusive representative for a period of three years, with automatic renewals for three-year terms unless either party served a written notice of termination at least 30 days prior…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pawlowski v. WoodruffAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. The Telex Corporation v. D. E. BalchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  2. John William Costello Associates, Inc. v. Standard Metals Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Friedkin v. Harry Walker, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1977
  4. Dorrell Associates v. Urb Products Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1971
  5. National Talent Associates, Inc. v. HollandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API