Legal Opinion

Dorrell Associates v. Urb Products Corp.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided September 9, 1971PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIrving Younger, J.

Although New York has regulated its employment agencies for nearly 70 years, the simple and important issue now before me has never been decided. It arises in a suit by Dorrell Associates, an executive placement firm, to recover $9,000 from Urb Products Corporation by way of compensation for finding Urb a director of marketing. Dorrell concededly possessed no employment agency license. In consequence, Urb argues, Dorrell may recover nothing; to which Dorrell responds that this transaction was exempt from any licensing requirement. The decision turns, not upon the facts, which are undisputed,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adams v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Abbye Employment Agency, Inc. v. RobinsonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1938
  3. Russell-Stewart, Inc. v. BirkettNew York Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. HerzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. John William Costello Associates, Inc. v. Standard Metals Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Friedkin v. Harry Walker, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1977
  4. Shelton v. Elite Model Management, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Linwood Consultants, Ltd. v. Sharon Frank Associates, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API