Legal Opinion

Caffey v. Soloray, Travelers Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 29, 2002No. 96,081PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSummers, J.

¶ 1 Claimant was injured on the job by a third-party tortfeasor. He settled for his injuries with the third-party (Walmart), and paid a portion of his settlement to his employer, who had been paying compensation benefits. The question here is whether a statute, 85 O.S.1991 § 44(a), relieves the employer of paying further comp benefits until the claimant can show a deficiency between the net amount he received in the settlement and the amount to which he is statutorily entitled on his compensation claim. The trial court and three-judge panel held the employer was so relieved, but the Court of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parkhill Truck Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Prettyman v. Halliburton Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Keeney v. TTC Illinois, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. Milliser v. Mercury Drilling Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Talbot v. WMK-Davis, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Deanda v. AIU InsuranceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  3. Deanda v. AIU InsuranceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  4. MEEKS v. GUARANTEE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  5. MEEKS v. GUARANTEE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API