Deanda v. AIU Insurance
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Concurrence 1
OPALA, V.C.J.,
concurring.
4 1 The court announces today-in answer to a question posed by a federal court-that Oklahoma does not recognize a bad-faith tort remedy for post-award harm inflicted by a *1086workers' compensation carrier. While I concur in the court's pronouncement, I write separately to explain the analytical framework for joining today's opinion.
THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
2 In 1999 the plaintiff filed four workers' compensation claims against Terra Telecom 1 alleging separate accidental on-the-job injuries. In December of that year the Workers' Compensation Court found that the plaintiff…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Boudreau.
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Christian v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- McCorkle v. Great Atlantic Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Manis v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Pryse Monument Co. v. District Court of Kay CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Lowman v. Piedmont Exec. Shirt Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.