Legal Opinion

Deanda v. AIU Insurance

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 20, 2004No. 98,986Published

1Concurrence 1

OPALA, V.C.J.,

concurring.

4 1 The court announces today-in answer to a question posed by a federal court-that Oklahoma does not recognize a bad-faith tort remedy for post-award harm inflicted by a *1086workers' compensation carrier. While I concur in the court's pronouncement, I write separately to explain the analytical framework for joining today's opinion.

THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION

2 In 1999 the plaintiff filed four workers' compensation claims against Terra Telecom 1 alleging separate accidental on-the-job injuries. In December of that year the Workers' Compensation Court found that the plaintiff…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Boudreau.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Christian v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. McCorkle v. Great Atlantic Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Manis v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  4. Pryse Monument Co. v. District Court of Kay CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Lowman v. Piedmont Exec. Shirt Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API