Legal Opinion

Schroader v. Schroader

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1995No. COA94-1281PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff’s first assignment of error is that the court erred by finding and concluding as a matter of law that plaintiff cannot claim as a change of circumstances her decision to quit her job and enroll in college. Plaintiff, having primary custody of the children, voluntarily left her employment to enroll as a full-time college student. As a basis for modification of child support, she claimed that her decision to go back to school resulted in a decrease in her income and justified an increase in defendant’s child support obligation. The trial court made the following…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wachacha v. WachachaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Tate v. TateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. O'NEAL v. WynnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Floto v. Pied Piper ResortSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Floto v. Pied Piper Resort, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Balawejder v. BalawejderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. Mittendorff v. MittendorffCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Young v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API