Legal Opinion
Whitlock v. Klamath County School District
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 17, 1999No. Agency No. 93-13776 CA A98297PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*466HASELTON, J.
Claimant petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that determined that his mental disorder was not compensable because, inter alia, the work-related preparation that allegedly produced claimant’s disorder was a “condition[ ] generally inherent in every working situation.” ORS 656.802(3)(b).1 We reverse and remand.
This case is before us for the second time. Whitlock v. Klamath County School District, 142 Or App 137, 920 P2d 175 (1996) (Whitlock I). Claimant taught music to elementary school children in the Klamath County School District (District) from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Booth v. Tektronix, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Fuls v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Bank of Newport v. WagesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Housing Authority of Portland v. ZimmerlyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Liberty Northwest Insurance v. ShotthaferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. AltabefCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Havlik v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Havlik v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- King v. Gallagher Bassett Ins. ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.