Legal Opinion

Havlik v. Multnomah County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 22, 1999No. 98-00608; CA A105086PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

Claimant petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board denying her stress claim. The Board concluded that claimant failed to establish that cognizable stressors were the major cause of her depression because her depression was caused, in part, by conditions “generally inherent in every working situation.” ORS 656.802(3)(b). We reverse and remand.

Claimant began working as an animal control officer at Multnomah County’s Animal Control Center in 1994. On October 16, 1997, she received a mental health evaluation and was diagnosed with major depression. The day after the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wood v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Fuls v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Whitlock v. Klamath County School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Whitlock v. Klamath County School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. King v. Gallagher Bassett Ins. ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API