Herrera v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MURRAY, J.
SUMMARY
Plaintiffs Robert and Gail Herrera lost their house in South Lake Tahoe to a nonjudicial foreclosure sale. They brought suit to set aside that sale. They challenge whether the parties that conducted the sale, defendants Deutsche1 *1369Bank National Trust Company (the Bank) and California Reconveyance Company (CRC), were in fact the beneficiary and trustee, respectively, under a deed of trust secured by their property, and thus had authority to conduct the sale. Plaintiffs also contend that they are entitled to be repaid for the expenses they incurred in repairing and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Love v. WolfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Lockley v. Law Office of Cantrell, Green, Pekich, Cruz & McCortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Joslin v. H.A.S. Insurance BrokerageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Poseidon Development, Inc. v. Woodland Lane Estates, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage Corp.California Supreme Court · 2016
- Bain v. Metropolitan Mortgage Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
- Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Jolley v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Intengan v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.