Oberst v. Mooney
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Harvey, J.:
This is an original proceeding in mandamus to compel the probate judge of Butler county to make an order for the final settlement of the estate of W. F. Oberst, deceased, finding that the plaintiff is the sole heir of the deceased and requiring Fred Oberst, administrator of the estate, to turn over to plaintiff, as such sole heir, the assets of the estate. An alternative writ was issued. The probate judge has made no answer or return thereto. The administrator has filed an answer. Affidavits on behalf of plaintiff have been filed and he has…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Proctor v. DicklowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
- State v. NagleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- State v. OberstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Skinner v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Hogg v. WhithamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United Trust Co. v. PykeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Rosenberger v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1960
- Gaston v. CollinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Schmidt v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Roberts v. WallaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.