Legal Opinion

Miller v. Dade County

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 22, 1980No. 79-1059PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant seeks reversal of an order requiring a new trial or, in the alternative, a remittitur. The reasons recited by the trial court in its order together with the record proper indicate the verdict may have been influenced by inflammatory statements concerning matters outside the record made during summation. The trial court, because of its superior vantage point, had broad discretion in this matter. Cassat Avenue Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Bobenhausen, 363 So.2d 1065 (Fla.1978); Wackenhut Corp. v. Canty, 359 So.2d 430 (Fla.1978); City of Miami v. Graham, 311 So.2d 697 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975);…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wackenhut Corp. v. CantySupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Cassat Avenue Mobile Homes, Inc. v. BobenhausenSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  3. City of Miami v. GrahamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fayden v. GuerreroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Mein, Joest & Hayes, M.D., P.A. v. WeissDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API