Legal Opinion

Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. City of Golden

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 8, 2002No. 01SA105PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

Two water rights decrees ("60s decrees") entered in 1961 and 1964 ("60s proceedings") gave the City of Golden ("Golden") the right to divert up to 4.66 cubic feet per second ("cf.s.") of Priority 12 water 1 continuously from May lst through October 31st. In Farmers High Line Canal & Reservoir Co. v. City of Golden, 975 P.2d 189 (Colo.1999), we held that claim preclusion prohibited the imposition of volumetric limits on these rights. 975 P.2d at 192. We reasoned that appellants were "precluded from seeking a modification of the decrees at issue because the decrees are unambiguous and because…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. Farmers Highline Canal & Reservoir Co. v. City of GoldenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  3. Weibert v. Rothe Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. Santa Fe Trail Ranches Property Owners Ass'n v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  5. City of Westminster v. ChurchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. City of GoldenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. Water Rights of Central Colorado Water Conservancy District v. City of Greeley ex rel. Water & Sewer BoardSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  3. State Engineer & the Division Engineer for Water Division 3 v. BradleySupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. Pagosa Area Water & Sanitation District v. Trout UnlimitedSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  5. Public Service Co. of Colorado v. Meadow Island Ditch Co. No. 2Supreme Court of Colorado · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API