Legal Opinion

Davis Wetlands Bank, LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 31, 2014No. 13-268 CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311(a), 1342(a), 1344(a), 1362(7), (12)-(14); Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2501 (Statute of limitations); Wetlands Mitigation Bank; 33 C.F.R. §§ 320-32, 332.3(a)(1) (General compensatory mitigation requirements), 332.8(o)(3) (Credit production); 40 C.F.R. § 230.10(d) (Restrictions on discharge); 60 Fed. Reg. 58,605-02, 58,-606 (Nov. 28, 1995) (defining “wetlands mitigation banking”).

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER

BRADEN, Judge.

I. RELEVANT STATUTORY AND REGULATORY BACKGROUND.

The Clean Water Act (“CWA”) prohibits the “discharge of any pollutant” into United States’…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API