Legal Opinion
Tri-State Home Improvement Co. v. Mansavage
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided May 17, 1977No. 75-230PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, C. J.
Three basic issues are presented: (1) Did the plaintiff substantially perform the contract?(2) Was it an abuse of discretion to deny the plaintiff’s motion to amend its complaint so as to state a cause of action for quantum meruit?(3) Did the proof establish violations of the provisions of Ch. Ag 110, 1 Wis. Adm. Code, dealing with unfair practices in home improvement contracts ?
On April 29, 1972, the defendants-respondents, Dennis and Bridget Mansavage entered into a written home improvement contract with the plaintiff-appellant, TriState Home Improvement Company, Inc., through its agent,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mortgage Associates, Inc. v. Monona Shores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- McLennan v. ChurchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Fullerton Lumber Co. v. TorborgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Valentine v. Patrick Warren Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Wipfli v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lindquist Ford, Inc. v. Middleton Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Webb v. B.C. Rogers Poultry, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- MacH v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- Goebel v. National Exchangors, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. Excel Management Services, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.