Legal Opinion

Huening v. Buckley

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 26, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Creditor’s Bill.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge,, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Windes

The only question necessary to be considered is whether appellants have a complete, adequate and.sufficient remedy at law to enforce their judgment against the appellee Buckley. If they have, then the decree dismissing the bill was proper, and it will be unnecessary to consider the other questions raised by appellants.

Sec. 3, Chap. 52, Rev. Stat. Ill. (1897), with reference to exemptions of homestead, provides that no property shall, by virtue of the act, be exempt from sale “ for a debt or liability incurred for the purchase or improvement thereof.”

It is claimed that because Buckley…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Gregg v. PalmerIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Stevenson v. MaronyIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  3. White v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Bush v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Bach v. MayIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. King v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Brown v. NelsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API