Legal Opinion
Anthony Mark Sewell v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 28, 2012No. 73A01-1112-CR-609PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Judge.
Anthony Mark Sewell (“Sewell”) appeals his conviction of committing a sex offender residency offense 1 as a Class D felony, contending that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction and that the conviction violated the prohibition against ex post facto provisions in both the federal and state constitutions.
We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Sewell was convicted of child molesting as a Class B felony in 2001. He was released from the Department of Correction in 2007 and placed on probation. Se-well, as an offender against children, was required to register…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Wallace v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- United States v. Richard Alan Brady, Frank Pontillo, Also Known as Franky Steel, Robert Montano, Michael Dematteo and John PateCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sidney Lamour Tyson v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Anthony P. Sharp, Jr. v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Dickie D. Bridges v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- State of Indiana v. Scott ZerbeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Jonathan G. McPherson v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.