Legal Opinion

Diehl, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Agriculture

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 2004No. 2002-1968PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Diehl, Inc., is a milk processor licensed by defendantappellee, the Ohio Department of Agriculture (“ODA”), with its principal place of business in Defiance, Ohio. Diehl purchases raw milk from milk producers to manufacture evaporated-milk products. It purchases approximately 50 to 60 percent of the milk it uses from out-of-state producers.

{¶ 2} Beginning in September 1998, the ODA’s Milk Sanitation Board required milk processors to pay monthly fees, as permitted by R.C. 917.031. From September 1998 until February 1999, the ODA invoiced…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. HealySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Release Compensation Board v. WithrowOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Dayton Power & Light Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Tobias v. FuerstOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API