Legal Opinion

United States v. Leo Parent

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 20, 1973No. 72-1419, 72-1504, 72-1600PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELL, Circuit Judge.

Leo Parent, Robert Quagliato, and Miklos Polesti appeal from their convictions of conspiracy and willful and knowing possession of goods stolen from an interstate shipment, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 659. On this appeal they contend that the goods at the time they were stolen had not yet become an “interstate shipment” as that term is used in 18 U.S.C. § 659 and that the evidence was insufficient either to show possession and knowledge of the theft of the goods or to support the conviction of conspiracy.

The case involves the theft of 250 mini-bikes from a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Barnes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Katzenbach v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Hammer v. DagenhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. WoleryOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. United States v. Robert E. Burns and Margaret Ann GreenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Roman SkoczenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Daniel R. Henneberry and William A. YoungermanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Charles David Parker A/K/A Ramp ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API