Legal Opinion

People v. Kay

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 26, 1973No. Crim. 10475PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DEVINE, P. J.

Appellants Newberry, Lavenberg and Kay pleaded nolo contendere to felony assault and felony battery (attacks on police officers). Various other charges against them were dismissed. All of the charges were related to a sit-in at Stanford University Hospital on April 8 and 9, 1971. Newberry’s appeal may be disposed of readily: he was not advised of his Boykin-Tahl rights; the Attorney General concedes this, and the judgment of conviction must be reversed. But the charges may be reinstated. (In re Sutherland, 6 Cal.3d 666, 671-672 [100 Cal.Rptr. 129, 493 P.2d 857].)

Lavenberg…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re AntazoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. In Re BushmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. DominguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. In Re SutherlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Coles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. State v. MurrayHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. BaumannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. People v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. People v. GoulartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API