People v. Kay
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DEVINE, P. J.
Appellants Newberry, Lavenberg and Kay pleaded nolo contendere to felony assault and felony battery (attacks on police officers). Various other charges against them were dismissed. All of the charges were related to a sit-in at Stanford University Hospital on April 8 and 9, 1971. Newberry’s appeal may be disposed of readily: he was not advised of his Boykin-Tahl rights; the Attorney General concedes this, and the judgment of conviction must be reversed. But the charges may be reinstated. (In re Sutherland, 6 Cal.3d 666, 671-672 [100 Cal.Rptr. 129, 493 P.2d 857].)
Lavenberg…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re AntazoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- In Re BushmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. DominguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- In Re SutherlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
3Cited by29 opinions
- Coles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- State v. MurrayHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. BaumannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- People v. GoulartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.