Legal Opinion

Everts v. Matteson

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 10, 1941No. Civ. No. 12985PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the above entitled appeal on the ground that appellants have voluntarily paid the amount of the judgment rendered against them in *15the trial court, thereby rendering the questions on appeal moot.

These are the essential facts:

Respondent recovered a judgment against appellants in the principal sum of $2,635.28, together with interest at 7% from June 24, 1938, and costs in the sum of $33.30. At the time of the judgment respondent held under attachment in the Security First National Bank of Los Angeles money of appellants in the sum of $4,000. After the judgment was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shaver v. TunsteadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Hartke v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reitano v. YankwichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Martínez v. Tribunal del Distrito Judicial de San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1949
  3. Greenspot Desert Inns, Inc. v. RoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Colón v. Club Rotario de AreciboSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1946
  5. Colón v. Rotary ClubSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API