Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Cooper

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 4, 1954No. 5-442PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

The principal question presented by this appeal is: Under what circumstances may it be presumed that the pleadings in a chancery proceeding were treated as amended to conform to the evidence? 'To properly present the question it is necessary to set out the material portions of the pleadings and the decree.

The Complaint. Appellee, Ellis Cooper, who was the plaintiff below, alleged: That he had for eight or ten years been a tenant on a farm belonging to appellant, Joe W. Fleming, and his tenancy was from year to year; that as such tenant he was to pay to appellant one-half of the net proceeds…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. H. Rouw Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  2. Faulkner v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  3. Chappell v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Dumas v. DanielsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pearson v. HenricksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Fleming v. CooperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  3. Fleming v. CooperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API