Legal Opinion

Causey v. Cottman Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 14, 1926No. Nos. 2472, 2458PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADDILL, Circuit Judge.

The transactions involved in these two causes were so related to each other that they were by consent heard together in the District Court *559and disposed of in a single opinion by separate decrees. They were on appeal heard together by this court, and will be disposed of here also in a single opinion. The cases in the District Court were decided in favor of the libelant in eaeh case, from whieh decisions respondents appeal. The parties will be referred to in this court as libelant and respondents. The two eases grew out of the same facts, and were determined largely upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. of NJ v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Nicholson v. Erie R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  3. Pan-American Petroleum & Transport Co. v. KenneallyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
  4. The CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The D., L. & W. No. 442Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  2. Keaton v. CeaserDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
  3. Mcanally v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API