Legal Opinion

Cleven v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

The defendant moves to set aside the verdict on the ground of newly-discovered evidence. The action is for false arrest and malicious prosecution, plaintiff charging that he was unlawfully arrested and maliciously prosecuted for having inserted a tinfoil slug instead of a nickel in defendant’s turnstile coin device at its Grand Central subway station.

Though held by the magistrate, the plaintiff was discharged by the Court of Special Sessions.

*595Originally the complaint alleged that at the time of the arrest the plaintiff was unemployed, and that his arrest and imprisonment prevented his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Collins v. Central Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  2. In Re Acquiring Title by the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Bloch v. SzczukowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  4. White v. SebringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  5. Schuyler v. NottinghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schnur v. CohenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934
  2. Brown v. New York City Transit AuthorityCity of New York Municipal Court · 1960
  3. Neremberg v. 600 East 178th Street Realty Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API