Legal Opinion

Schnur v. Cohen

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided September 12, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSulzberger, J.

The defendant Cohen moves to set aside the verdict on the ground of newly-discovered evidence. The action, according to the indorsement on the summons, was for money loaned on November 15, 1933. This date is repeated in plaintiff’s *677bill of particulars. On the trial the date was amended to November 15, 1928. The plaintiff repeatedly and unequivocally denied any loan of the amount claimed. On the contrary, with a show of assumed righteous indignation, he testified that the money was given for the purpose of obstructing the administration of justice. He claimed that the occurrence took place…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McKeon v. . Van SlyckNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. People v. . DoodyNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Platt v. MunroeNew York Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Nugent v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. Frohlich v. ZeltzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. William F. Regan, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  2. Reoux v. First National Bank of Glens FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API