London v. Fairbanks Municipal Utilities, Employers Group
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BONEY, Chief Justice.
Appellant, Charles London, seeks an interpretation of certain provisions of our Workmen’s Compensation Act governing compensation of losses resulting from temporary partial disability. 1 The facts of the case are not disputed, a stipulation having been set forth by the parties on appeal. During the summer of 1966, Charles London suffered an industrial accident while in the course of his employment with Fairbanks Municipal Utilities. As a result of the accident, London was totally disabled for some time. While working for Fairbanks Municipal Utilities, London…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1969
- Gorman v. Atlantic Gulf & Pacific Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
- Sherman v. Holiday Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
- Alaska Industrial Board v. Chugach Electric Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hood v. State, Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Flisock v. State, Division of Retirement & BenefitsAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Bailey v. Litwin Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Buechler v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Haile v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.