Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Ingram
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided July 14, 1976No. 91PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAKE, Justice.
G.S. 58-72, not part of the Act of 1975 here in question, provides:
“Kinds of insurance authorized: — The kinds of insurance which may be authorized in this State, subject to other provisions of this Chapter, are set forth in the following paragraphs. Nothing herein contained shall require any insurer to insure every kind of risk which it is authorized to insure. * * *
“(13) ‘Personal injury liability insurance,’ meaning insurance against legal liability of the insured, * * * arising out of the death or injury of any person, or arising out of injury to the economic interests of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Terral v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- General Electric Credit Corp. v. Home Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Stephens v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1995
- Coburn by and Through Coburn v. AgustinDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1985
- Treants Enterprises, Inc. v. Onslow CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Insurers' Action Council, Inc. v. HeatonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.