Legal Opinion

Michigan Mutual Life Insurance v. Bowes

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1879PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Wayne. Assumpsit on insurance policy. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

There are no disputed facts in this case. On the fifteenth day of November, 1873, the plaintiff in error issued to Mary E. Bowes, the defendant in error, a policy of insurance by which the payment of ten thousand dollars was assured to her on the death of her husband, William B. Bowes, in consideration of the payment of an annual premium of four hundred and thirty-*21four dollars and eighty cents. Mr. Bowes himself effected the insurance, and instead of paying the first premium in money, gave his note therefor. November 15, 1874, the second premium was paid, and the note which was given for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hotchin v. SecorMichigan Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Berry v. American Central Insurance Co. of St. LouisNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Arnold v. Empire Mutual Annuity & Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Rauen v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Veal v. Security Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. Coughlin v. Reliance Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API