Legal Opinion

Rowand v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1885PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from Franklin District Court. ACTION brought by E. M. Rowand against Peter Anderson and another, to recover the value of a certain fence which was situate on his land, having been erected thereon by his vendor, and which was removed by the defendants, who claimed to own the same.

Read the full summary

Error from Franklin District Court. ACTION brought by E. M. Rowand against Peter Anderson and another, to recover the value of a certain fence which was situate on his land, having been erected thereon by his vendor, and which was removed by the defendants, who claimed to own the same. It was tried upon the following agreed statement of facts: “On the 12th day of March, 1878, Charles S. Anderson purchased of S. O. Thacher, and S. O. Thacher conveyed to Anderson, the southeast quarter of section 31, town 15, range 20, in Franklin county. This land, as also the southwest quarter of the same…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

JOHNSTON, J.:

The only question presented for our decision is, whether the fence, the value of which is sued for in this action, was owned by the plaintiff at the time of its removal by Peter Anderson and August Carlson. The fence was built by the defendant, Charles S. Anderson, upon the -plaintiff’s land when it was owned by S. O. Thacher, under a parol permission given by Thacher that the fence might be built a few feet over upon Thacher’s land as a protection to a hedge which Anderson was about to plant on the dividing line between his own land and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Prince v. CaseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1835
  2. Eaves v. EstesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  3. Powers v. DennisonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
  4. Dostal v. McCaddonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  5. Houx v. SeatSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. Fred W. Wolf Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Burbridge v. TherrellSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. Cross v. Weare Commission Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Schmuck v. BeckMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  5. James Leo Co. v. Jersey City Bill Posting Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API