Curtisa Henry v. City of San Pablo, et al.

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CURTISA HENRY, 7 Case No. 26-cv-06886-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 9 COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE CITY OF SAN PABLO, et al., DISMISSED IN PART PURSUANT TO 10 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) Defendants. 11 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff, who is not represented by counsel, applied to proceed in forma pauperis and the 15 Court granted her application. See Dkt. No. 5. The Court now reviews the sufficiency of 16 Plaintiff’s complaint to determine whether it satisfies 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Because some 17 of…