Legal Opinion

Fadely v. Fadely

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 4, 1929No. 28,805PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

The appellees move to dismiss the appeal in this case because the appellant has accepted substantial benefits of the judgment, and has thereby waived his right of appeal and is estopped to maintain such after receiving and appropriating the benefits of the judgment. The benefit referred to is an attorney fee of $500'allowed by the trial court as a fee for plaintiff’s attorney, and was a part of the judgment rendered from which the appeal is taken.

*288Appellant maintains that the nature and character of this action make it an exception to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Singer v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Bolen Coal Co. v. Whittaker Brick Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  3. Ralston v. RalstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Toner v. Conqueror Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. Tomb v. BardoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  3. Petty v. PettySupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Hyland v. HogueSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  5. Clothier v. WallaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API