Legal Opinion
Emmenegger v. Bull Moose Tube Company
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 30, 2003No. 16-4429Published
1Opinion of the Court
324 F.3d 616
Charles E. EMMENEGGER; Robert F. Ritzie; James E. Riley, Appellees/Cross-Appellants,
v.
BULL MOOSE TUBE COMPANY; Caparo, Inc.; Bull Moose Tube, Ltd., Appellants/Cross-Appellees.
No. 02-2088.
No. 02-2089.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: December 9, 2002.
Filed: March 21, 2003.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied: April 30, 2003.*
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Francis E. Pennington, argued, St. Louis, MO (Francis X. Neuner, Jr., on the brief), for appellant.
Frank Susman, argued, St. Louis, MO (Melanie R. King and David W. Harlan, on the brief), for appellee.
Before…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Calvin Berthelsen v. Maurice KaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Gerald W. Kerr v. Charles F. Vatterott & Co. Commerce Bank of St. Louis, N. A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.